Re: SHA-1 broken

[<dullien () gmx de>]

Hey all,

> shown that what I would've thought to be the Next Best Thing - RIPEMD
> - is yet another flawed system.

As far as I know, RIPEMD-160 is unbroken, and
unlikely to be broken quickly because of the need to find
collisions for the two "separate channels". Or did they publish
a RIPEMD-160 attack together with the MD5 breaks ?

Cheers,
Thomas Dullien