Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows
From: "J. Oquendo" <sil () infiltrated net>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:24:08 -0400
Casper.Dik () Sun COM wrote:
But a "0 day vulnerability" is meaningless as a definition; it applies to a vulnerability for exactly 24 hours and then is meaningless. ALL vulnerabilities were discovered at some point and had their 24 hours of "0 day fame" by your definition. It just does not make sense. Casper
Should we now create a new term for the industry +0day or 1day. How about? nowaday -- ==================================================== J. Oquendo "Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta" http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E sil . infiltrated @ net http://www.infiltrated.net
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- 0day: PDF pwns Windows pdp (architect) (Sep 20)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Gadi Evron (Sep 20)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Crispin Cowan (Sep 21)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Steven Adair (Sep 21)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Chad Perrin (Sep 21)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Wayne D. Hoxsie Jr. (Sep 21)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows bugtraq (Sep 21)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Crispin Cowan (Sep 21)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows coderman (Sep 21)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Casper . Dik (Sep 21)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows J. Oquendo (Sep 21)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Gadi Evron (Sep 20)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Crispin Cowan (Sep 24)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Chad Perrin (Sep 24)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Crispin Cowan (Sep 24)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows J. Oquendo (Sep 25)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Lamont Granquist (Sep 25)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Roland Kuhn (Sep 25)
- RE: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Thor (Hammer of God) (Sep 25)
- defining 0day Gadi Evron (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Brian Loe (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Gadi Evron (Sep 25)