Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk
From: Rob Thompson <my.security.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:21:15 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Martin wrote:
My theory - there are gazillion corporate and business apps that don't run on IE7 thus users do not update even their personal PCs (for VPN access to those apps.). I work for a hospital and we have apps that only recently with IE6. When we ask about plans for IE8 support, we get the blank stare. Who doesn't love ActiveX?
Yeah, that was what I tried to get at earlier. So now, what does that say about us? Who's the sucker... We are PAYING for that type of crappy service.
------------------------------------------------- This message is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of accuracy, correct grammar and spelling, lack of vulgarity or adult themes, correct references, absence of viruses and/or viral memes, originality, or fitness for any particular purpose. ------------------------------------------------- --- On Tue, 7/1/08, Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk> wrote:From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk> Subject: RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk To: bugtraq () securityfocus com Date: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 8:27 PM Paul Schmehl to Larry Seltzer:My completely non-scientific,unsupported-by-empirical-evidence answer isno. It's because people who use Firefox tend tobe more aware of securitythreats and the need to keep software up to date. Itcould also be (atleast in part) because Firefox has a built-in,enabled-by-default, updateavailable warning system.I would agree with both those reasons and add that FF updates are not hampered by the disabling of the inbuilt (and often seriously mistrusted) OS auto-update mechanisms. I also _suspect_ that a lot of pirated copies of Windows probably have system updates disabled. Regards, Nick FitzGerald
- -- Rob +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ | _ | | ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | | - against HTML email X | | / \ | | | +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Ignorance is bliss... iEYEARECAAYFAkh5BCYACgkQcfN68iZZIccO2gCguiXZhH2xzYIge2QJeEmKkAT8 VNEAniAxzm7UMRW2xWGCP/iFtfaz5fDM =UlWl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Stefan Frei (Jul 01)
- RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Larry Seltzer (Jul 01)
- RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Larry Seltzer (Jul 01)
- RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Paul Schmehl (Jul 01)
- RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Nick FitzGerald (Jul 02)
- Re: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Rainer Duffner (Jul 02)
- RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Jeff Martin (Jul 11)
- Re: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Rob Thompson (Jul 12)
- RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Paul Schmehl (Jul 01)
- Re: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Rob Thompson (Jul 02)