Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives
From: Paul Younker <Paul.Younker () GREENVILLE EDU>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:22:09 -0500
We had a Packetshaper 4500 series running on our network for a little more than 12 months. We didn't use it any longer than that because Packeteer designated the product as end-of-life and discontinued the software updates for the product. Without the software (and protocol identification) updates, the product's usefulness is severely limited. Our only option with Packeteer was to spend an additional significant amount of money to upgrade to a 6500 unit a little over a year after buying the 4500 unit. We are now in the process of evaluating a demo (new) NetEnforcer. Based upon the information we have received, it appears unlikely that Allot will arbitrarily discontinue updates for the products they sell. Our very initial impressions of the NetEnforcer are that it is superior to the Packetshaper for a substantially smaller investment. I will be extremely reluctant to purchase any products from Packeteer in the future. Paul Younker Associate Director of Information Technology Greenville College Greenville, IL 618.664.7072 618.664.7172 fax paul.younker () greenville edu I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I intended to be. - Douglas Adams -----Original Message----- From: Gaddis, Jeremy L. [mailto:jlgaddis () IVYTECH EDU] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:44 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: [SECURITY] Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Hi, I am interested in hearing opinions on Packeteer, Inc.'s PacketShaper product as well as any opinions of competing devices. I am looking to perhaps deploy the Packeteer to shape outbound traffic and send some of it to the bitbucket ("net radio", P2P, etc.). Thanks, -j -- Jeremy L. Gaddis <jlgaddis () ivytech edu> Special Projects Manager Computer & Technology Services Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana 812.330.6156 (w) 812.797.6176 (m)
Current thread:
- Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Gaddis, Jeremy L. (Oct 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Julian Y. Koh (Oct 24)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Cal Frye (Oct 24)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Justin Dover (Oct 24)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Stephen W. Bradley (Oct 25)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Ramon Hermida (Oct 25)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Mark Poepping (Oct 25)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Paul Younker (Oct 26)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives William Green (Oct 26)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Scott Conti (Oct 26)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Cal Frye (Oct 26)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Paul Younker (Oct 31)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Cal Frye (Oct 31)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Paul Younker (Nov 01)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Anthony Maszeroski (Nov 01)
- Re: Opinions regarding Packeteer Packetshaper & alternatives Beechey, Jim (Nov 01)