Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: classifying P2P traffic
From: Justin Dover <Dover () HARPETHHALL ORG>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:18:22 -0600
We use a Allot Netenforcer and a Cisco ASA with IDSM module. It catches P2P very well and if you want to spend the time, you can do packet captures with the IDSM and block the newer P2P apps. Justin Dover Harpeth Hall School 615-346-0082 The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv <SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU> on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 8:49 AM -0600 wrote:
What devices are you using to monitor P2P traffic and how well are they working for you? Is there some P2P traffic that you believe your monitoring software isn't catching? Ie. encrypted traffic, outdated P2P definitions from the vendor, etc. Thanks. Jason Youngquist jryoungquist () ccis edu
Current thread:
- classifying P2P traffic Youngquist, Jason R. (Jan 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: classifying P2P traffic David Boyer (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Consolvo, Corbett D (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Greene, Chip (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Hughes, Scott (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Justin Dover (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Julian Y. Koh (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Alex (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Harris, Michael C. (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Michael Hornung (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Michael Hornung (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Lutzen, Karl F. (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic jkaftan (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Alex (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Samuel Young (Jan 29)
- Re: classifying P2P traffic Cal Frye (Jan 29)
(Thread continues...)