Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel
From: Nick Kartsioukas <lists.educause.security () CHANGE NIGHTWIND NET>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:09:00 -0800
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:58 -0600, "Mark Monroe" <markm196 () NETSCAPE NET> wrote:
We are architecting a new vpn service on campus and some people want split tunneling and some do not. I am not 100% sure either way. Anyone have any examples or data that might push me either way?
Reasons for split tunnelling: Quicker access to non-VPN resources (such as refreshing perezhilton.com every 18 seconds), reduced bandwidth usage by VPN endpoint, permit access to local resources like home networked printers and storage. Reasons against split tunnelling: Ability to analyze/filter all traffic from the client, for example protection against a zombie relaying information from behind the VPN to an outside party. -- Nick Kartsioukas Cuesta College Computer Services 805-546-3248
Current thread:
- vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Mark Monroe (Feb 07)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Nick Kartsioukas (Feb 07)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Julian Y. Koh (Feb 07)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel James R. Pardonek (Feb 07)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Valdis Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Nathaniel Hall (Feb 07)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Chris Green (Feb 07)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Nathaniel Hall (Feb 08)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Dexter Caldwell (Feb 09)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Nathaniel Hall (Feb 08)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Greene, Chip (Feb 07)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Allan Williams (Feb 07)
- Re: vpn split tunnel or no split tunnel Mark Monroe (Feb 07)
(Thread continues...)