Re: Microsoft antivirus

[Dexter Caldwell <dexter.caldwell () FURMAN EDU>]

I'm very glad to hear this.  We are considering the same thing and ePO reporting has been unmatched to date, though it 
does take some effort to configure.

D/C

From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Drew 
Perry
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 12:52 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Microsoft antivirus

We switched from McAfee ePO to Microsoft's FEP/SCCM last fall. The reporting from SCCM has been invaluable. Agent 
installs, rogues, infections, remediations, patch levels. ePO had many of these reports but was just nowhere near as 
user friendly. I'm loving it.

Drew Perry
Security Analyst
Murray State University
(270) 809-4414
aperry () murraystate edu<mailto:aperry () murraystate edu>

***MSU Information Systems staff will never ask for your password or other confidential information via email.***


On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Rickard, Josh A. <rickardj () health missouri edu<mailto:rickardj () health missouri 
edu>> wrote:
I work for the University of Missouri and we are currently using Forefront Endpoint Protection 2012 and it works pretty 
well for our situation.

I worked at another University where they were using Avast for their environment.  It's free as well, but only under 
1000 clients (I believe).

Josh Rickard
Atlas Team
System Support Analyst
School of Medicine
884-5173* MA315
ACA Certified

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () 
LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>] On Behalf Of Ed Zawacki
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 11:18 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>
Subject: [SECURITY] Microsoft antivirus

I'm curious as to whether anyone has taken advantage of their campus'
Microsoft licensing agreement to switch from say McAffee or Symantec's endpoint solution to Microsoft's?

If so, how are you feeling about the Microsoft solution?

Or, if you thought about it and decided not to do it, I'm also interested in the rationale/any documentation you might 
have on that decision.

(Obviously, the cost savings would be nice, but I'm not too impressed by what I see from MS. Just wondering if I'm 
missing something)

Thanks

--
Ed Zawacki
Chief Information Security and Privacy Officer Academic Computing and Communications Center University of Illinois at 
Chicago
(312) 996-0658<tel:%28312%29%20996-0658>

General Security Line: (312) 432-0074<tel:%28312%29%20432-0074>