Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: FWTK and smap/smapd
From: Russell Van Tassell <russell () loosenut com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:02:49 -0700
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 03:16:33PM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
(1) smap/smapd don't have a perfect security track record. qmail and Postfix do.
QMail: http://online.securityfocus.com/bid/1809 (actually cmd5checkpw) http://online.securityfocus.com/bid/2237 Postfix: http://online.securityfocus.com/bid/3544/info/ http://online.securityfocus.com/advisories/3722 http://online.securityfocus.com/bid/1428/discussion/ (actually Cyrus IMAP) Admitedly only a 30 second Google on each, and not something that haven't been seen elsewhere... ;-)
[...] (4) smap/smapd are _SLOW_. Orders of magnitude slower than sendmail. Postfix and qmail are _FAST_ --- many times faster than sendmail.
What about message loss? I seem to remember at one point QMail being rumored to suffer from that problem more-so than other mailers. Sendmail itself, though perhaps slow, tends to go through rather painful effort to make sure that messages are rarely lost.
(5) smap/smapd adds complexity to a mail server. Sendmail+smap/smapd is about as complex as you can get. Either qmail or Postfix is far, far simpler than sendmail alone, let alone sendmail+smap/smapd. Simple is good. It works better.
Hmmm... sendmail, procmail, smrsh and smapd - along with some sort of virus checker? ;-)
[...] For whatever it's worth, I personally like Postfix better. But I wouldn't dispute with anybody who likes qmail better.
Eh... as you elude to, I think it's all a matter of 1) preference and 2) what you know. If it works from you and /it actually works reliably/ then, well, it's a holy war after that if you ask me... As you said, FWIW... Best Regards, Russell -- Russell M. Van Tassell russell () loosenut com "If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten." -- George Carlin _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- FWTK and smap/smapd Behm, Jeffrey L. (Jul 16)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Jerry Wintrode (Jul 16)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Kevin Steves (Jul 16)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Bennett Todd (Jul 16)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Russell Van Tassell (Jul 16)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Joseph S D Yao (Jul 17)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Frederick M Avolio (Jul 17)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Joseph S D Yao (Jul 17)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 19)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Joseph S D Yao (Jul 19)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 19)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Anton J Aylward, CISSP (Jul 19)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Paul D. Robertson (Jul 19)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd R. DuFresne (Jul 19)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Joseph S D Yao (Jul 19)
- Re: FWTK and smap/smapd Russell Van Tassell (Jul 16)