Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Proxy and Stateful together ??
From: Bennett Todd <bet () rahul net>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:18:45 -0500
2002-11-16-11:05:40 Paul D. Robertson:
Might park a snort on it while I was about it, too.Hmmm, isn't that adding a level of bloatedness that's a bit extreme?
Depends on the context. If the environment supports the investment to have multiple boxes implementing the firewall, then this would certainly be one of the first choices for moving off onto a separate box. If not, I don't think the bloat is that bad; for small shops, the performance impact isn't that bad, and the code seems (in my experience anyway) nice and stable. It's not as tiny as it once was, but it's still not that bloated by modern standards anyway:-). -Bennett
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Proxy and Stateful together ?? Jean Caron (Nov 15)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Bennett Todd (Nov 16)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Paul D. Robertson (Nov 16)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Jean Caron (Nov 16)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Bennett Todd (Nov 18)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? R. DuFresne (Nov 18)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Bennett Todd (Nov 18)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Jean Caron (Nov 18)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Bennett Todd (Nov 18)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Paul D. Robertson (Nov 16)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Bennett Todd (Nov 16)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? Bennett Todd (Nov 18)
- Re: Proxy and Stateful together ?? OpenBSD Paul D. Robertson (Nov 16)