Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN
From: MHawkins () TULLIB COM
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:08:46 -0500
This is off topic but does anyone know of the method to run code on the REXX. I have one of 'em too and it always seemed a crying shame to not be able to reprogram it to do something useful. -----Original Message----- From: ArkanoiD [mailto:ark () eltex net] Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 10:37 AM To: Dragos Ruiu Cc: Marcus J. Ranum; Frank Knobbe; Hawkins, Michael; firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN nuqneH, Rex is z80-based and easy programmable (though 8bit and slow) On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:13:25PM -0800, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
On February 23, 2005 05:18 pm, you wrote:Dragos Ruiu wrote:The problem with the old PDA idea is user reluctance.Then get SecurIDs or whatever for the few users who insist on 'em. But there are PDAs that are tiny, too - credit card size like the Oregon Scientific PDA293 ($9.95 at officedepot.com) or Xircom's Rex, which needs no cradle because it fits in a PCMCIA slot to sync and recharge...Heh, being a gadgetaholic, I own a Rex... (which was not amongst my most stellar purchases btw, or long-lived in terms of use, though it was small enough in its pcmcia form factor that it rattled around in my suitcase for years before i noticed it and threw it in the dinosaur equipment pile with the newtons and many other strange oddball devices). I don't know anything about the Oregon Scientific device, but the Rex is a non starter. First killer is the frighteningly limited input system, and second is the high level of reverse engineering needed to retrofit anything onto that device as it has nothing resembling a programmatic interface or any user accessible code bits. It's only marginally more useful than a paper printout of your contacts, though the batteries don't die on paper. :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- The information contained in this email is confidential and may also contain privileged information. Sender does not waive confidentiality or legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately; you should not retain this message or disclose its content to anyone. Internet communications are not secure or error free and the sender does not accept any liability for the content of the email. Although emails are routinely screened for viruses, the sender does not accept responsibility for any damage caused. Replies to this email may be monitored. For more information about the Collins Stewart Tullett group of companies please visit the following web site: www.cstplc.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN, (continued)
- RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN MHawkins (Feb 22)
- RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN MHawkins (Feb 22)
- Re: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN Kevin (Feb 22)
- Re: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN David Lang (Feb 24)
- Re: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN Kevin (Feb 22)
- RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN Crissup, John (MBNP is) (Feb 22)
- FW: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN Paul Melson (Feb 22)
- RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN Behm, Jeffrey L. (Feb 22)
- RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN MHawkins (Feb 22)
- Re: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN Kevin (Feb 23)
- Message not available
- RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN Marcus J. Ranum (Feb 23)
- RE: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN MHawkins (Feb 24)