Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Cisco acls
From: Stephane <stephane.d () ecologie net>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:40:56 +0100
Eric Appelboom wrote:
Hi, I would appreciate some comments with regard to the extensive use of cisco routers acls To protect numerous networks. My concern is that when someone amends an access-list one generally enters, no access-list 177 and Then pastes in the new access list. Does this mean that for a period of time there is no protection on the Network that the acls applies? Best Regards EricMWEB: S.A.'s trusted Internet Service Provider. Just Like that. To join, click here or call 08600 32000. _______________________________________________firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
what you can do is to create access-list 178... and then swap quickly... Stephane _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Cisco acls Eric Appelboom (Mar 01)
- Re: Cisco acls Daniel Linder (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Bruce Smith (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Mark Teicher (Mar 12)
- Re: Cisco acls Kevin (Mar 24)
- RE: Cisco acls Mark Teicher (Mar 12)
- Re: Cisco acls Steve Saeedi (Mar 04)
- Re: Cisco acls Luca Berra (Mar 07)
- RE: Cisco acls Mathew Want (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Ben Nagy (Mar 04)
- Re: Cisco acls Stephane (Mar 04)
- Re: Cisco acls Miha Vitorovic (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cisco acls Behm, Jeffrey L. (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Matthew.Harvey () usdoj gov (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Paul Melson (Mar 04)
- Re: Cisco acls Luca Berra (Mar 07)
- RE: Cisco acls Luke Butcher (Mar 06)
- RE: Cisco acls Luke Butcher (Mar 07)
- RE: Cisco acls Andrew Yourtchenko (Mar 12)
- RE: Cisco acls MHawkins (Mar 07)
- RE: Cisco acls Scott Stursa (Mar 12)
(Thread continues...)