Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: RE: In defense of non standard ports
From: "Behm, Jeffrey L." <BehmJL () bvsg com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:28:37 -0600
On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:57 AM, Marcus J. Ranum so spake:
Most organizations have already given up control over outgoing traffic. What they don't realize is that, by extension, they have also given up control over incoming traffic.
And, to me, are seeming to make it more difficult for those who haven't to maintain control. Overheard at the water cooler: "Well, company X allows this traffic, why don't we? They are much larger than us and probably understand security *much* better than we do. Since they think it's safe, shouldn't we think it's safe, too?" I'm still looking for wording used to combat the cluelessness of such mindset in both our own companies, as well as companies that are creating situations that make us run web traffic on non-web ports. Jeff _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports, (continued)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Chuck Swiger (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Paul D. Robertson (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Tim Shea (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Paul D. Robertson (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- RE: In defense of non standard ports Brian Loe (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports ArkanoiD (Jan 25)
- RE: RE: In defense of non standard ports Bill Royds (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: In defense of non standard ports Karl (Jan 24)