IDS mailing list archives
RE: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules
From: "Dimitris Patsos" <dpat () space gr>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:42:06 +0300
Hi, Let me add another complexity dimension in this topic. Few IDS/IPS vendors can correlate their vulnerability assessment tools with their IDP products (i.e. McAfee,IBM,Tenable,and a few others). None of them however, can link vulnerabilities with exploits and IDP signatures as well, which makes sense since IDP detects attacks (i.e. one or more vulnerabilities exploited in a predefined -not random- order) not plain vulnerabilities. The IDP community -to the best of my knowledge- is still missing a topological-aware mechanism to produce potential attacks based on real vulnerabilities found in systems/networks. To this extend, it is still virtually impossible to eliminate false positives in IDP (learning mode is a nightmare for those who tried, clearly not an option) while it's also extremely hard to eliminate false negatives in VA tools (it would be great if a tool could base verdict upon partially discovered signs of attacks). What seems of interest and what I've been working on this for the last couple of years is to integrate post-incident capabilities (e.g. info from SIEMs) along with vulnerability scoring (like Mitre's CVSS) into IDP/VA tools. This would allow for quite flexible configuration scenarios in IDP, since vulnerabilities are discovered (VA tool) and (semi)automatically scored (CVSS), verified (SIEM information) while a smaller set of signatures (IDP) can detect and block attacks since they can break the predefined order of vulnerability exploit. In other words, such a view could allow for policies based on attack paths and not underlying OS, network topology, collision domains, groups or VLANs. Thanks a lot, Dimitrios Patsos, Ph.D.(Cand),M.Sc.,CCSE,CCDA,CCSP,CME -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Enigma Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:44 PM To: Ravi Chunduru Cc: Focus IDS Subject: Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Ravi Chunduru wrote:
Hi, There are over 30000 CVE vulnerability reports. Many IDS/IPS devices have around 4000-5000 signature rules. My guess is that these signatures may cover (detect)around 4000-7000 attacks. 23000 to 26000 CVEs, that is, significant number of CVEs are not covered by IDS/IPS devices. I am guessing that there is reason for this. IDS/IPS vendors may be selecting few CVEs for developing signatures. What is the selection criteria followed in industry? One criteria, I know is that Network IDS/IPS devices don't need to worry about attacks that can only be mounted on the local machine, that is, NIDS/NIPS devices only need to worry about detection of attacks mounted remotely. Are there any other considerations? Thanks Ravi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaig n=intro_sfw
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Couple of things: 1. If you are talking about Network IDS/IPS, not all vulnerabilities are remotely exploitable. Some local vulnerabilities can only be detected by a HIDS if they can be detected at all. 2. Keep in mind that CVE is Common **Vulnerability* *and Exposures, so it covers any vulnerability where IDS/IPS are generally exploit-centric. How are you going to detect if a vulnerability is exploited if there is no publicly known exploit? How do you find something when you don't know what it looks like? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaig n=intro_sfw to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules abhicc285 (Jun 03)
- Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Jose Nazario (Jun 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Enigma (Jun 03)
- RE: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Dimitris Patsos (Jun 03)
- Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Leon Ward (Jun 03)
- Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Enigma (Jun 05)
- Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Joel Esler (Jun 05)
- RE: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Srinivasa Addepalli (Jun 03)
- Re: CVE selection for IDS/IPS signature rules Ravi Chunduru (Jun 03)