Just a suggestion

[full-disclosure () lists netsys com (hellNbak)]

I think you misunderstood the question.  full-disclosure is *NOT*
moderated.  I am wondering why people prefer this over the model that
VulnWatch uses.

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Ka wrote:

> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:31:49 +0200
> From: Ka <ka () khidr net>
> Reply-To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Just a suggestion
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> At Mittwoch, 28. August 2002 17:47 Steve Manzuik wrote:
> > As someone who moderates a mailing list or two, I am curious.  What is the
> > issue with moderation?  Why does a model where there are multiple
> > moderators not work compared to this model?
>
> AFAIK the list is unmoderated (please correct me, if I'm wrong).
>
> Ka
> - --
> http://www.khidr.net/users/ka/pgpkey.asc
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE9bPr172vu22ltWBERAtU0AJ48nUOHLHcyf6642lky9RGL35hpWwCfa/Ax
> 3NCwvyfnhE7FMKl+XjfzA0o=
> =PgO6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

"I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent"

hellNbak () nmrc org
http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-