Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Just a suggestion
From: full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Steve)
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:49:00 -0400
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 12:34 pm, Snow, Corey wrote:
Uniformity of enforcement is difficult (impossible?) to achieve on any moderation policy that is content-based.
Clearly written policies are easy to follow. F.ex: Msg intended to disrupt the list with threats and degrading comments are not to be let through. Conversly you could replace any four letter words with "[bleep]" Others where the same message is sent repetitively (twice or more) seemingly from the same, or not, address should be stopped. It's easy to tell what belongs and what does not. If the indended purpose is to have an outlet for security holes and liabilities, then a discussion about someone being an a[bleep] is OT. (Of course a discussion list could have all that for those who don't mind.) I've not really read the list description to write the policies, but I bet if I did I could write ones that could not be misinterpreted and would be supported by 80%. Assuming 20% is just trying to create trouble. These simple rules would drop the noise level a lot, and letting all sec related posts through, without lowering the value of the list. -- Steve Szmidt V.P. Information Technology Video Group Distributors, Inc.
Current thread:
- Just a suggestion Schmehl, Paul L (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Ka (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion David Benfell (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Andrew Thomas Pinski (Aug 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Just a suggestion Steve Manzuik (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Ka (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion hellNbak (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Ka (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Snow, Corey (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Steve (Aug 28)
- YAWHT ? Ka (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Ron DuFresne (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Steve (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Snow, Corey (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Steve (Aug 29)
- Just a suggestion full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Aug 28)
- Just a suggestion Ka (Aug 28)