Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: SpamAssasin - path disclosure
From: Kane Lightowler <kane.lightowler () it alstom com au>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:06:27 +1000
ViLLaN - Yes you are correct. Morning_Wood - I never denied that the tag in the header was not spam assasin. The tag about the quarantine however is from Trends Interscan Viruswall. What else are you trying to say? That spam assasin is not only a spam filter but a virus scanner also? If this is your box you are playing with is it running interscan virus wall or is viruswall sitting as a mail relay anywhere on the network? Even IF spam assasin was to magically start scanning for viruses why the hell would it quarantine files to a /etc/iscan/virus/ dir? YES you are still wrong Kane -----Original Message----- From: ViLLaN [mailto:villain () protonic com] Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 10:42 AM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure No one is denying that Spamassasin is in use, they are saying that the section of the header showing the path (what your original post was about from what I understood), is Interscan, not Spamassasin.. -----Original Message----- From: morning_wood [mailto:se_cur_ity () hotmail com] Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 10:25 AM To: ViLLaN; full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure sigh http://www.google.com/search?hl=en <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=X-Spam-Checker-Versi on%3A+SpamAssassin+&btnG=Google+Search> &ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=X-Spam-Checker-Version%3A+SpamAssassin+&btnG=Google+Sea rch 1. http://www.cs.arizona.edu/computer.help/policy/spam_filtering.html <http://www.cs.arizona.edu/computer.help/policy/spam_filtering.html> 2. http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2003-Apr/0554.html 3. http://spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_PerMsgStatus.html <http://spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_PerMsgStatus.html> 4. http://lpsc.in2p3.fr/informatique/faq/spamassassin.html <http://lpsc.in2p3.fr/informatique/faq/spamassassin.html> 5. http://www.unit.liu.se/irt/epost/spamassassin.html <http://www.unit.liu.se/irt/epost/spamassassin.html> still wrong? Donnie Werner co-cofounder - Chief Technical Officer e2-labs Pvt Ltd ----- Original Message ----- From: ViLLaN <mailto:villain () protonic com> To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com <mailto:full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 4:25 PM Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure Kane is correct... Interscan viruswall is responsible for that quarantine.. CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient,please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.
Current thread:
- RE: SpamAssasin - path disclosure, (continued)
- RE: SpamAssasin - path disclosure Kane Lightowler (Aug 24)
- Re: SpamAssasin - path disclosure morning_wood (Aug 24)
- RE: SpamAssasin - path disclosure ViLLaN (Aug 24)
- Re: SpamAssasin - path disclosure morning_wood (Aug 24)
- RE: SpamAssasin - path disclosure ViLLaN (Aug 24)
- Interscan - path disclosure - WAS:SpamAssasin - path disclosure morning_wood (Aug 24)
- Re: Interscan - path disclosure - WAS:SpamAssasin - path disclosure Steffen Kluge (Aug 24)
- RE: Interscan - path disclosure - WAS:SpamAssasin - path disclosure Bojan Zdrnja (Aug 24)
- Re: SpamAssasin - path disclosure morning_wood (Aug 24)
- RE: SpamAssasin - path disclosure Kane Lightowler (Aug 24)
- Re: SpamAssasin - path disclosure Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- Re: SpamAssasin - path disclosure morning_wood (Aug 24)