Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Can DCOM be disabled safely?
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 10:15:23 -0500
--On Saturday, August 02, 2003 10:05:00 +0100 CHeeKY <cheekypeople () sec33 com> wrote:
As previously discussed with you Paul, I am sorry but your policy of how you update and what you do seems somewhat backward, havent you ever heard of third party software
Of course I have. And as I stated in a previous post, if I had a million dollars I'd *buy* all that third party software. But I don't, so I can't.
Oh yeah. I have time for that. I *have* written several things to automate certain processes as have many others in IR at UTD (as do many edus, for the same reasons, no money to buy commercial solutions), but there are only so many hours in a day.or even weirder, making your own.
Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- -- command line unix rpc/dcom vulnerability checker -- from buildtheb0x bobby manly (Aug 01)
- Can DCOM be disabled safely? Paul Schmehl (Aug 01)
- Re: Can DCOM be disabled safely? CHeeKY (Aug 02)
- Re: Can DCOM be disabled safely? Paul Schmehl (Aug 02)
- Re: Can DCOM be disabled safely? CHeeKY (Aug 02)
- Can DCOM be disabled safely? Paul Schmehl (Aug 01)