Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER
From: "mattmurphy () kc rr com" <mattmurphy () kc rr com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:45:43 -0400
"guninski () guninski com" writes:
point. You whine about two weeks to produce a patch from MS, and then
you
wait for an open source project to patch a bug for almost a month, they don't even start, and you still praise their project. That's hypocrisy
i take lies about our favorite editor seriously. the vim developers fixed the original bug soon. they fixed 2 more semi private bugs which i disclosed to them later in the discussion. the workaround in my advisory stop potential future exploits via modelines. i am satisfied by vim response time. i stand by my claim that vim is better than windoze.
You can't compare VIM and Windows, that is comparing two things with entirely different reaches and purposes. So, I should ask, what is the point in that??? Secondly, if you are an advocate of full disclosure, why weren't these "semi private" exploits revealed along with the other, if you are indeed following the full disclosure model? I think you can't stand by your previous word, so you use degrading terms like "kiddie", to try and undermine my credibility. It is quite ridiculous, if you ask me.
it is fun that i am pita for m$ and trolls like you even without
disclosing >m$ sh*t :) If anyone here is a troll, it is you. I have not gone around labeling people "kiddie" without the slightest knowledge of the background to their claims, something that you have done. You have consistently bashed Microsoft, even though you have been completely idle with respect to Microsoft since July. I ask where those claims can possibly come from, unless of course you have other "semi private" exploits, Georgi? I've learned something about you -- you only stick to your word, and follow the standards you've set before, if and when it suits you. I think the word that "dhtml () hush com" (since we have no name for this anonymous fan of yours) used fits well here -- turncoat. You support full disclosure when it gives you an opportunity to make a major vendor look bad. Plain and simple. -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER, (continued)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER pandora (Jul 19)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER dhtml (Jul 15)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER mattmurphy () kc rr com (Jul 18)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER mattmurphy () kc rr com (Jul 19)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER w g (Jul 19)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Troy Solo (Jul 19)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 19)
- Re: Vendor v. Open-Source Response (was GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER) Karl DeBisschop (Jul 20)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Georgi Guninski (Jul 20)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER w g (Jul 19)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka (Jul 20)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER mattmurphy () kc rr com (Jul 20)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER northern snowfall (Jul 20)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Jeremiah Cornelius (Jul 22)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER northern snowfall (Jul 20)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER dhtml (Jul 20)
- Re: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Remko Lodder (Jul 20)
- RE: GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER Scott Renna (Jul 21)