Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: correct names [was: 3127/tcp by Doomjuice (Kaspersky) - MyDoom takeover?]
From: dgj <dgj+ () pitt edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:23:50 -0500
On Feb 9, 2004, at 2:59 PM, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
Yes -- Deadhat (more correctly known as Vesser) was found late Friday or early Saturday (depending on your TZ) but this new one, DoomJuice, (incorrectly originally classified as a Mydoom variant and thus called Mydoom.C by some) has only been isolated and analysed in the last few hours... -- Nick FitzGerald Computer Virus Consulting Ltd. Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854
Greetings,Deadhat/Vesser, DoomJuice/Mydoom.c, "more correctly known as", "incorrectly originally classified as", ...
Is there, or will there ever be any kind of "naming authority" for these things? I assume that most major av houses have telephones & email access, so why isn't there any kind of agreement on names? The lack of a single name for a threat is kind of bogus.
Is this driven only by the marketing departments at the firms?And how does the poor, long-suffering sysadmin know what the correct name is, google them all when the dust settles and see what gets the most hits??
--dj _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- 3127/tcp by Doomjuice (Kaspersky) - MyDoom takeover? Erik van Straten (Feb 09)
- Re: 3127/tcp by Doomjuice (Kaspersky) - MyDoom takeover? Nick FitzGerald (Feb 09)
- Re: correct names [was: 3127/tcp by Doomjuice (Kaspersky) - MyDoom takeover?] dgj (Feb 09)
- Re: correct names [was: 3127/tcp by Doomjuice (Kaspersky) - MyDoom takeover?] Gregory A. Gilliss (Feb 09)
- RE: correct names [was: 3127/tcp by Doomjuice (Kaspersky) - MyDoom takeover?] Daniel Otis-Vigil (Feb 09)
- Re: correct names [was: 3127/tcp by Doomjuice (Kaspersky) - MyDoom takeover?] dgj (Feb 09)
- Re: 3127/tcp by Doomjuice (Kaspersky) - MyDoom takeover? Nick FitzGerald (Feb 09)