Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject))
From: "http-equiv () excite com" <1 () malware com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:32:26 -0000
How many of these little essays are you going to publish? Who will decide which one[s] gets published. Will it be the only one that you can reply to that you feel you can score points against. Who are you and what is your claim to fame? You certainly showed your audience with your response 'directly to the authors' of "Cyberinsecurity: The Cost of Monopoly. How the Dominance of Microsoft Products Poses a Risk to Security." http://www.mcpmag.com/newsletter/article.asp?EditorialsID=170 I take it that in the healthy debate than ensued the authors of that little piece clarified their position to your satisfaction. Why has your boss sent you? What ails him that he is incapable of posting this little "challenge" of his himself? It appears that the "security watch" newsletter is published only to / by Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine Online why have you tried to suggest that the "JAVA publication, a couple for the Feds, some for education market" will be the audience of this as well. What do you mean you are not an employee? "Security Watch" is your column. Perhaps you do it for free in order to generate goodwill amongst the subscribers of your magazine, who all no doubt have a vested interested in everything Microsoft. Then with a bit of luck they'll end up buying your book[s]? Roberta Bragg, MCSE: Security, CISSP, Security+ and contributing editor for MCP Magazine, runs Have Computer Will Travel Inc., an independent firm specializing in security, operating systems and databases. She's a frequent speaker and trainer for TechMentor. Her newest book is MCSA/MCSE Implementing and Administering Security in a Windows 2000 Network Exam Cram 2 (Exam Cram 70- 214) by Que Publishing. You can contact Roberta about "Psychologically Acceptable Security" at . "If you believe that Security Watch is a pro-Microsoft publication " -- nice try. It's precisely this rank amateur gibberish that Microsoft employees along with its little elves that defines it's inability to do anything right. Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine Online: <meta name="description" content="Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine brings you the latest independent information on Microsoft products and MCP certification programs and is relied upon by Windows, SQL Server and .NET experts worldwide."><meta name="keywords" content="Microsoft, MCSE, MCP, MCSD, MCP, MCSA, MCDBA, MCT, 2003, Windows, NT, XP, RSS, XML, Certification, IT, Salary, Engineer, Windows, Internet, Certify, Exam, Test, Network, Office, Magazine, Computer, .NET, Online"> The "Security Watch" column inside the "Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine" catering [and relied upon mindyou]to Windows, SQL Server and .NET experts worldwide is not 'pro' [whatver that is supposed to mean] Microsoft. Get your boss out of his Microsoft logo'd Lazy Boy recliner and post and run his debate here. On this mailing list. Where it can be debated. Not addressed in reply one time like you did before. And he can donate his not inconsiderable sum of a grand total of "$50.00" to the SPCA. Ridiculous. -- http://www.malware.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Chris Cozad (Feb 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) http-equiv () excite com (Feb 11)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) roberta bragg (Feb 11)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Trevor Benson (Feb 12)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Paul Schmehl (Feb 12)
- RE: Security Watch Essay Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Feb 13)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) roberta bragg (Feb 11)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Schmehl, Paul L (Feb 12)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Keith Ward (Feb 12)
- Re: RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) James Bliss (Feb 12)