Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject))
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:41:11 -0600
--On Thursday, February 12, 2004 09:39:41 AM -0800 Trevor Benson <tbenson () a-1networks com> wrote:
You know what I love. How a usefull list has 40% of the posts some snotty little comment a child (regardless of chronological age) has to make to insult someone else in the list. Which of course spawns the other 40% rebuttals to the attacks. When in all reality, not one of us cared what the child said, or the defense of your decision to post. Hmmm, trying to remember. Did I join the list for Soap Opera while reading email, or to keep up with current issues and security??? I am guessing it must have been the soap operas......
Just apply the standard 80/20 rule. 80% of the posts are useless. The other 20% make the list worth subscribing to.
Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Chris Cozad (Feb 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) http-equiv () excite com (Feb 11)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) roberta bragg (Feb 11)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Trevor Benson (Feb 12)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Paul Schmehl (Feb 12)
- RE: Security Watch Essay Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Feb 13)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) roberta bragg (Feb 11)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Schmehl, Paul L (Feb 12)
- RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) Keith Ward (Feb 12)
- Re: RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject)) James Bliss (Feb 12)