Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject))


From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:41:11 -0600

--On Thursday, February 12, 2004 09:39:41 AM -0800 Trevor Benson <tbenson () a-1networks com> wrote:

You know what I love. How a usefull list has 40% of the posts some snotty
little comment a child (regardless of chronological age) has to make to
insult someone else in the list.  Which of course spawns the other 40%
rebuttals to the attacks.  When in all reality, not one of us cared what
the child said, or the defense of your decision to post.

Hmmm, trying to remember. Did I join the list for Soap Opera while reading
email, or to keep up with current issues and security???  I am guessing it
must have been the soap operas......

Just apply the standard 80/20 rule. 80% of the posts are useless. The other 20% make the list worth subscribing to.

Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: