Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list


From: Christoph Gruber <grisu () guru at>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:44:39 +0100

On Thursday 15 December 2005 07:20 mis () seiden com wrote:

how many people who actually find value in this list (which i have,
since len rose set it up quite a long time ago) agree with this
position?

I cannot answer a number, but I can speak for myself:
I don't want a moderated list, b'caus a moderated is what you called 
degenerated.
I saw a lot of lists (starting with nntp in the good old times) coming and 
going, and every died on regulations.
so put the assholes in here in your killfile and everything is fine.

BTW: don't answer list-postings with PM.

if you think there's a compelling reason for no moderation, i'd like to
hear it.

i call to your attention three brief selections from the list charter,
which is at
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
which i think have been violated recently:

"Members are expected to maintain a reasonable standard of netiquette when
posting to the list." "Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic
discussion should be taken off-list wherever possible." "Gratuitous
advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is forbidden."

That's cool, anything else?

-- 
Christoph Gruber
"If privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy." Philip Zimmermann
Fingerprint: A2A8 8AB0 6F30 A7DD 880B F74F BA6B 2182 646A 0649
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: