Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A MODERATED LIST


From: Rembrandt <rembrandt () jpberlin de>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:50:16 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:39:41 +0000
Joe Average <yahooinsider () gmail com> wrote:

On 12/15/05, uber () hush com <uber () hush com> wrote:

I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA.  MAKING
THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY
RESEARCHER.  I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED CHOICES IN MY
DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGITIMATELY.  I WILL ONLY GET THE
GOOD STUFF AND NONE OF THIS PISSING CONTEST WHICH IS KILLING THIS
LIST.  MODERATING WOULD MAKE THE LIST MUCH MORE PROFESSIONAL AND
WOULD BRING IT ONE STEP ABOVE SECURITY FOCUS.

ONCE AGAIN.  I AM 150% FOR THE MODERATION OF FULL-DISCLOSURE.


no need,

a) ban all gmail addresses
b) ban nicknames (real name only)
c) start inforcing list policy for trouble makers who attack legitimate
researchers like netdev

Even I could name myself Ben Bosten or Marc Yenkfield or
%any_other_kobination.

Such researchs could (and they are) be illegal in some countries.
Like writing Exploits is illegal in France...

Think twice before you write an e-mail.


A gentleman angreement would be fine of course.
I don't understand why peoples blamer others or even insult them.
So with a gentleman-angreement we may could solve this. :)

Kind regards,
Rembrandt
- -- 
God did a bless on me,
So accapt the dark side in you.
Hate leads me to victory, so give me a war.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD)

iD8DBQFDoZ7IHXWDTKj6tTkRAhs0AJ4lg7hrIc2sQZofeJ4bdWWslhosWQCgxzAF
JJD98YFPTxsaSHIzNzukS0M=
=Yjmn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: