Re: Recall: Oracle read-only user can insert/update/delete data

[Michael Holstein <michael.holstein () csuohio edu>]

> In my experience, it doesn't even work in an Exchange environment. The
> user gets a message that the message should be recalled, but the
> original is still there, even if it hasn't been read yet. I've heard
> people say that at one time it would auto-delete the message if it
> hadn't been read, but I've never seen that.

It does, provided you read the "recall" message first -- but since 
Outlook (by default) displays in reverse chronological order, and most 
people read email in the order received, it does little good.

Back when I was involved in Exchange administration, I can't tell you 
how many times I had to stop services and run exmerge against the store 
to clean out messages that somebody accidently sent to a distribution list.

That .. and all the people that got embarassed due to incorrect use of 
"reply-all" ;)

~Mike.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/