Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**

["Dave \"No, not that one\" Korn" <davek_throwaway () hotmail com>]

Pete Simpson wrote:

> This demonstrates that if the model were valid the minimum possible
> duration of complete collapse would be 87.9 seconds.

  Well then, this demonstrates that your model is not valid.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... 



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/