RE: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**

[pauls () utdallas edu]

--On May 16, 2006 11:48:01 PM +0100 Pete Simpson 
<Pete.Simpson () clearswift com> wrote:
> The official account of 9/11, as affirmed repeatedly by governments and
> media, therefore contradicts Newton's Second Law of Motion by at least a
> factor of ten (out by an order of magnitude). Newton's Laws may have
> stood the test of time admirably for centuries, but as we have been told
> time and again, the world changed irreversibly on the 11th of September
> 2001 and officially, by implication, so too did the Newton's Laws of
> Motion.
Wow.  I guess you're more knowledgeable than some of the most eminent 
scientists in the US (physicists and structural engineers, architectural 
engineers, etc., etc.), who modeled the collapse of the towers and proved 
conclusively that it happened exactly the way witnesses saw it.

Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/