Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**

[Ducki3 <duckhacks () gmail com>]

Here is a good 911 conspiracy debunking site. I haven't had time to read it
all but surely enough I will over the weekend.

http://www.geocities.com/debunking911/index.htm


Ducki3


On 5/18/06, Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu> wrote:
> c0ntex wrote:
> > WTC 7 was demolished at 5pm or there abouts by controlled demolition.
> > The owner of the building admits that they decided to "pull it" and
> > the reason "because so many people had been killed in the other 2
> > towers". Odd reason, considering what information was stored there.
> >
> > Check it out at http://www.911revisited.com/video.html
> >
> Call me a fool, but I watched the entire video.  To say that the
> "experts" in the video were playing fast and loose with the facts would
> be an understatement.  It's certainly an appeal to authority but not an
> authority that's really authoritative.
>
> Call me still thoroughly unconvinced.
>
> BTW, Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.  There was no conspiracy there either.
>
> --
> Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
> Adjunct Information Security Officer
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/