Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:07:26 +0300
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 06:21:35PM +0200, Pavel Kankovsky wrote:
On the other hand, It is possible to "detect all bad programs" if it is allowed to err on the safe side and mistake some good programs for bad programs. An extreme example is to call all programs bad unless their exact code appears on the list of known good programs.
i doubt this can be remotely implemented in practice because of dynamic code like |eval| and mobile code. can |code| be realistically distinguished from |data| for current OSes (e.g. is a vim modeline *only a* plain string or a string + program) ? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Gödel and kernel backdoors Georgi Guninski (Sep 18)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors mrx (Sep 18)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors Giuseppe Fuggiano (Sep 18)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors BMF (Sep 18)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors wmsecurity (Sep 20)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors Pavel Kankovsky (Sep 19)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors Georgi Guninski (Sep 19)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors Berend-Jan Wever (Sep 19)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors Christian Sciberras (Sep 19)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors Georgi Guninski (Sep 19)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors Hurgel Bumpf (Sep 20)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors Georgi Guninski (Sep 20)
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Gödel and kernel backdoors dave b (Sep 20)