Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member


From: Laurelai <laurelai () oneechan org>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:45:34 -0500

On 9/30/2011 11:59 AM, adam wrote:
"Cause them to face punishment in what country? Wouldn't they have to
extradite them? What if their extradition treaty didn't cover
cybercrime, or they didn't have one with the US?"

I'm not sure you understood the example, and the mixing and matching
you're doing here doesn't really work. If they're being "extradited"
for violating a court order - it wouldn't very well be cybercrime,
would it? No. Secondly, in the example provided, the service
[provider] resides in the same place as the court handling the case -
so there'd be no need for extradition in the first place. Third, If
you take things out of context, twist them and then question them - of
course they're not going to make much sense.

Lastly, you're talking about the prosecution of such crimes. That's
entirely different than a court ordering that X service turn over Y
information about Z user. 
Its possible i misread it i have been up for over 24 hours
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: