Re: Linux - Indicators of compromise

[Benji <me () b3nji com>]

SO you're talking about making a baseline?

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Ali Varshovi <ali.varshovi () hotmail com> wrote:
> Hello everybody and thank you for your useful comments.
>
> Now I'm thinking that we need a comparison base or normal behavior profile to be able to detect any deviations or 
> abnormal/suspicious activity. While some known patterns of behaviors are useful to detect malware or backdoors we 
> still need that normal profile to detect 0-day or APT style intrusions. Isn't that the same idea from early days of 
> intrusion detection research (anomaly detection approach)? Or maybe I'm off track.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ------Original Message------
> To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
> Subject: Linux - Indicators of compromise
> Sent: Jul 14, 2012 8:46 AM
>
> Greetings FD,
>
> Does anyone have any guidelines/useful material on analysis logs of a Linux machine to detect signs of compromise? 
> The data collection piece is not a challenge as a lot of useful information can be captured using commands and some 
> scripts. I'm wondering if there is any systematic approach to analyze the collected logs? Most of the materials I've 
> seen are more aligned to malware and rootkit detection which is not the only concern apparently.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ali
> .
> ---------------------------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry device
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/