funsec mailing list archives
Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms
From: Dave Dittrich <dittrich () u washington edu>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
This way of progating fixes may still prove useful in controlled environments. YMMV?
Some folks at Xerox PARC tried that in 1980, to disasterous results. See: http://www.owled.com/essays/virus.html ...and: http://news.com.com/Year+of+the+Worm/2009-1001_3-254061.html Originally coined in a 1982 paper by researchers John Shoch and Jon Hupp of the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, the term "worm" is derived from "The Shockwave Rider," a 1972 science-fiction novel about the downfall of an Orwellian society caused, to some degree, by a "tapeworm" program that liberated data as it proliferated through networks. Shoch and Hupp had needed a way to automate the installation of Ethernet-performance measuring tools on more than 100 computers at Xerox PARC, so they turned to a class of programs that could send and install themselves across the network. The programs installed quickly, could be updated and ran automatically. "What we called the worm is a kind of distributed computation that is a really interesting and powerful thing," said Shoch, now a general partner at venture capital firm Alloy Ventures in Palo Alto, Calif. But to the pair's dismay, when their program developed a bug, the bad code automatically spread across the network as well. "The worm would quickly load its program into (the computer); the program would start to run and promptly crash, leaving the worm incomplete--and still hungrily looking for new (computers)," Shoch and Hupp wrote in a 1982 paper on the experiments with that and other self-spreading programs. "The embarrassing results were left for all to see: 100 dead machines scattered about the building." -- Dave Dittrich Information Assurance Researcher, dittrich () u washington edu The iSchool http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich University of Washington PGP key http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/pgpkey.txt Fingerprint FE97 0C57 0843 F3EB 49A1 0CD0 8E0C D0BE C838 CCB5 _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms, (continued)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Dude (Oct 06)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Florian Weimer (Oct 06)
- RE: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Aditya Deshmukh (Oct 06)
- RE: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Dave Dittrich (Oct 06)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Florian Weimer (Oct 18)
- RE: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Aditya Deshmukh (Oct 18)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Dude (Oct 06)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Eduardo Tongson (Oct 06)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Roland Dobbins (Oct 06)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 06)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Oct 06)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Dave Dittrich (Oct 06)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Eduardo Tongson (Oct 06)
- Re: Nematodes: The Making of 'Beneficial' Network Worms Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Oct 07)