funsec mailing list archives

Re: Sony, Rootkits and Digital Rights Management Gone Too Far


From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:36:00 +1300

Florian Weimer wrote:

The really interesting question is if you can legally publish software
which removes such rootkits.  Even detection is a tricky subject.

When first discovered, there was some concern that researching the 
thing may leave one liable to allegations under the DMCA because this 
"rootkit" is part of a copy-protection mechanism.

My personal opinion on this is that such an accusation is baseless, as 
the "rootkit" functionality is instaleld without permission, is 
unremovable and deliverately compromises the security of its "victims" 
machines (it hides directories, files and reg keys (values?) whose 
names start with "$sys$ -- it will probably be a few weeks before we 
see a bot, virus or worm incorporating this "for the hell of it", but 
it's almost sure to happen now the sloppy design of this crap-ware has 
been publicized).

The "required media player" (it clearly isn't -- the company behind 
this copy protection program is proud of the fact that discs made using 
their protection scheme are legitimate Red Book discs and thus may 
rightly claim them to be "CDs", and inserting the discs in a Mac or 
Linux machine, or a Winbloze box with autorun disabled or not running 
as a user with admin privs leaves the disc totally usable by other 
mainstream audio CD player sofwtare, as it is a Red Book audio disc) 
does not need to be so heavily protected (and if hadn't been, it 
wouldn't have raised such a stink).  Worse, the EULA does not mention 
the rootkit functionality and that functionality is not a necessary 
part of the media player.  Even worse yet, the sofwtare is not 
uninstallable.  The previous two points mean that Sony (through its 
bundling of this third-party application) are in direct breach of 
several already, or about to be, enacted "anti-spyware" regulations.  I 
believe that California already has such regulations and although New 
York doesn't have specifically "anti-spyware" regulations, the DA's 
office there has been actively persuing some "anti-spyware" cases 
through its existing computer crime/misuse regulations.

Savvy CA and NY lawyers should start class-action suits against Sony 
BMG...


Regards,

Nick FitzGerald

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: