funsec mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet
From: Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:22:09 -0700
On 11/8/05, Steven Champeon <schampeo () hesketh com> wrote:, unless you count
me as a "follower" of GWB, which I strenuously deny, then you're wrong.
I try not to discount a persons ideas just because he believes differently than I. Everyone can have good ideas, even Democrats =D The best thing would have been to leave Iraq alone , aside from lifting the trade embargo on Medicinal Supplies (Clinton actually helped kill more Iraqi's than both Bushes combined, with 1 mil dying during the 90's from a lack of medicine, mostly children see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Iraq#Iraq_under_UN_Sanction). Saddam was a Prick, and we put him in power after Equiping His Armies (we should beg forgivness for that alone but I digress). This Fact should not be in Doubt.(see: http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&q=saddam+rumsfeld&spell=1) Still though, after all the hatred our tampering in the affairs of this region for the past Half Century had brought about (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks#Motive) , He was the only one in the area who was In Power and not a friend of Extremist Religon. Now that he is gone, the country will be devided into warring sects of variying beliefs further spreading strife and chaos, further destabilizing my self image. Now you dont know me, but I am pretty ugly and my self image is already pretty bad. so next time tell me I just need to correct my thinking, and not that I am not wrong, cuz lets face it: None of us knows the whole truth. I am mostly just guessing from bits and pieces stiched together from varying reports delivered by biased sources. Unless you know someone in the area (See Pierre's thread on Riots in France) then you dont know the truth. All I know is if, instead of supporting chaos by arming (insert mammal) we just gave out food, water, and medicine (note lack of the word Doctrine in that list) a lot less people would want to kill US. -JP "Even though this is Security, its not Fun" ;-) -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Fergie (Nov 07)
- Re: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Pierre Vandevenne (Nov 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Brian Azzopardi (Nov 08)
- Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Pierre Vandevenne (Nov 08)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Paul Schmehl (Nov 08)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Dude VanWinkle (Nov 08)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Steven Champeon (Nov 08)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Dude VanWinkle (Nov 08)
- Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Pierre Vandevenne (Nov 08)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Nick FitzGerald (Nov 08)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Paul Schmehl (Nov 09)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- RE: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Richard M. Smith (Nov 09)
- Re[4]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Pierre Vandevenne (Nov 09)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Martin Wehlou (Nov 09)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Paul Schmehl (Nov 09)
- Re: Re[2]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Dude VanWinkle (Nov 09)
- Re[4]: French ruling party having a riot on the Internet Pierre Vandevenne (Nov 09)