funsec mailing list archives
Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms
From: "David Lodge" <dave () cirt net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:56:11 -0000
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:48:59 -0000, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
DMCA is *not* an acronym. It's an abbreviation. An acronym can be pronounced (like radar, laser and NATO). DMCA cannot be pronounced (easily: DAM-ca? DUM-ca?) ergo it is not an acronym...Feeding 'define:acronym' to Google finds this:word formed from the initial letters of a series of words. (eg, IEEE is an acronym for Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers).www.lib.vt.edu/help/instruct/glossary.html
And of course, everything on the Internet is factually accurate?Referring to printed media: The Oxford Guide to Style is pretty much the essential book for English writing (being the style guide of Oxford University, though it still advocates the evil Oxford Comma). This defines: "Acronyms are formed from the initial letters of words (SALT, Nazi, radar), the results being pronounced as words themselves."
(This is one of those arguments held by grammarians constantly, just like whether prepositions are acceptable at the end of a sentence (they are) or whether it is okay to split infinitives (it is))
Note that if there was an absolute requirement for words to be pronounceable, Worcestershirewould be ruled illegal due to having an incorrect number of syllables, and anyloanword of Welsh origin would be taken out back and shot... ;)
This is side stepping the original point, but the UK is replete with place names like this, e.g.: Loughborough (Luf-bra), Berkshire (Barkshire), Leicester (Les-ta), Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwyll-llantysiliogogogoch, ad nauseam.
Pedant point held :-) (Though I agree firmly with you about words of Welsh origin!)
dave _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Fergie (Jan 22)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms David Lodge (Jan 23)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 23)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Nick FitzGerald (Jan 23)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Dude VanWinkle (Jan 24)
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Gary Funck (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms der Mouse (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Nick FitzGerald (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 23)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms David Lodge (Jan 23)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Drsolly (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms David Lodge (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Richard Cox (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms David Lodge (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Willy, Andrew (Jan 23)
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Nick FitzGerald (Jan 24)
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Alex Eckelberry (Jan 24)
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Fergie (Jan 24)
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Paul Schmehl (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Richard Cox (Jan 24)
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Paul Schmehl (Jan 24)