RE: Court says cops can't yank video: 'Baby cam' catches arrest on tape

[Blanchard_Michael () emc com]

 interesting that they'd be so concerned over that.  It was very civil, and
the arresting officers were nothing but kind and courteous to the perp
during the arrest.

  Is this a case of big brother not wanting to be watched?


Michael P. Blanchard 
Antivirus / Security Engineer, CISSP, GCIH, MCSE, MCP+I 
Office of Information Security & Risk Management 
EMC ² Corporation 
4400 Computer Dr. 
Westboro, MA 01580 


-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On
Behalf Of Blue Boar
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 3:08 PM
To: Richard M. Smith
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org
Subject: Re: [funsec] Court says cops can't yank video: 'Baby cam'
catchesarrest on tape

Richard M. Smith wrote:
> Under state law, Jean could be jailed for up to two years if tried and
> convicted of taking the tape public, provided she knew it was
intentionally
> recorded without the permission of state police.


Video on front page here:
http://conte2006.com/
If you're curious, like me.

Now... why would I need the police's permission to film myself being 
arrested in my house?

Everyone was extraordinarily reasonable during the whole arrest, as 
shown in the video.  Why should the police have a problem?

So much for private cams and police cams having equal protection.

                                        BB
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.