RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public

["D'Aloisio, Marc" <Marc.DAloisio () ct gov>]

I've been away for a few days, and have not read this entire thread, but my $0.02:

Interestingly enough, law enforcement can use 'publicly displayed' in regard to the fourth amendment (search and 
seizure).  Some examples:

http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&cid=1099528830154

http://www.library.ca.gov/CRB/97/05/crb97-005.html#4amend - Note the 'fourth amendment implications' 
Section

An article on electronic visual surveillance (should not regular photography be held to the same standard?):

http://grove.ufl.edu/~techlaw/vol9/issue2/guirguis.html



Marc D'Aloisio, CISSP
Network Security Analyst; Security Incident Response
State of Connecticut - Department of Information Technology

-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Blanchard_Michael () emc com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 16:59
To: rms () bsf-llc com; funsec () linuxbox org
Subject: RE: [funsec] Things you can't take pictures of in public


And yet, you can go to the beach, on a hot summer day, with your video camera and film all the people on the beach that 
you want.... With only the fear of a BIG boyfriend beating the snot outta you for filming his girlfriend sun-bathing :-)

  the way I look at it, if it's in public, it's fair game for ANY picturetaking or filming.  If something shouldn't be 
filmed or snapshotted, then it shouldn't be in plain public view....


Michael P. Blanchard 
Antivirus / Security Engineer, CISSP, GCIH, MCSE, MCP+I 
Office of Information Security & Risk Management 
EMC ² Corporation 
4400 Computer Dr. 
Westboro, MA 01580 


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.