funsec mailing list archives
Return of n3td3v?
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:26:04 -0500
from http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6037439.html Lawsuit challenges new 'e-annoyance' law A new law targeting "annoying" e-mail messages and Web posts is being challenged in federal court. The plaintiff, a Web site that lets people send anonymous e-mail for a fee, said the suit was necessary because the law is so broad it makes providing the service a crime. "What we are seeking to do is have that portion of the statute declared unconstitutional," said Charles Mudd, an attorney in Chicago who's representing TheAnonymousEmail.com. ------------- Watch out suckers, the courts are upholding the important freedoms! ;-) -JP(who prefers to remain anonymous) *************Disclaimer************* this email is being sent in jest. Dude believes that you should have the right to annoy anonymously and does not feel the need to provide proof of the tenacity of his belief, for actions speak louder than words.... Unless you are a Senator. *************Disclaimer************* _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Return of n3td3v? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 24)
- Re: Return of n3td3v? coderman (Feb 25)
- Re: Return of n3td3v? Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Feb 25)