funsec mailing list archives
RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:47:20 +1200
Larry Seltzer reported: <<snip>>
"...Bruce Lehman, Patent Office commissioner through much of the 1990s, once summed up the problem when he said, "We are the patent office, not the rejection office."
<<much sensible-sounding stuff snipped>> Wow -- excellent news. I guess Lehman must not get much campiagn funding from IT or technology companies... 8-) ... As I'm not a WSJ subscriber, so could someone who is tell me if these plans will allow "review-before-suit" for patents already granted under the old processes? Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent, (continued)
- Re: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent der Mouse (Mar 30)
- Re: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Drsolly (Mar 30)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Drsolly (Mar 30)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Nick FitzGerald (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Richard M. Smith (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Nick FitzGerald (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Richard M. Smith (Mar 29)
- Re: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 30)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Larry Seltzer (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Nick FitzGerald (Mar 29)
- RE: Vulnerability-based IPS Patent Larry Seltzer (Mar 29)