RE: An interesting packet inspection problem

[Stephen Villano <stephen.villano () us army mil>]

My suggestion was hanging by their own patch cable by their genitals.
Command wouldn't go for it and promoted them instead...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On
> Behalf Of Drsolly
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:32 AM
> To: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
> Cc: funsec () linuxbox org
> Subject: Re: [funsec] An interesting packet inspection problem
>
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:22:46 GMT, Drsolly said:
> > > Hopefully, the fix will
> > > now be simple, and involve either the replacement of faulty hardware,
> or
> > > the cutting-off-of-hands of a faulty engineer.
> >
> > That's the harshest "*BAD* noc-monkey! No Banana!" I've seen in a
> while...
>
> Huh? No, that's the standard punishment for a first offence of making the
> entire internet for several countries immpassable to large files.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.