funsec mailing list archives

Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block


From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 18:44:46 GMT

Is it too much to ask? Absolutely not, in my opinion.

In fact, I fully expct it is everyone's right to be secure
and unmolested in your personal communications until such a
time that _reasonable_cause_ can be shown to a court that you
have commited some sort of crime. :-)

Any any event, great reference! :-)

- ferg

p.s. For anyone wondering, Grapthar's Hammer:

 http://imdb.com/title/tt0177789/ 

-- Greg Poirier <grep () reflexsecurity com> wrote:

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 18:13 +0000, Fergie wrote:
I suppose you're right, given that I'm not a Skype user,
nor a VoIP user in any way, shape, or form.  :-)

But I'll bet this will: http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgpfone/

I hadn't seen this.  Excellent.

Of course, it won't help with traffic analysis, but that's where
something like a Tor system would come in handy. :-)

By Grapthar's Hammer, I don't care about traffic analysis.  I just want
secure untraceable communication.  

Is that so much to ask?!?!?!?! (more punctuation means more emphasis)

grep

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy


Current thread: