funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:55:14 -0400
On 5/15/06, Brian Loe <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:
Proof for what? Oh, and the impeachment had nothing to do with a blow job - it was about lying under oath. If you can lie under oath then the oath you take for office is meaningless as well. I wasn't a fan of Clinton or the impeachment - but once again some folks just can't help but mischaracterize it for their own benefit.
If Clinton had just declared his wang important to National Security, we could have avoided a lot of meaningless conversations. -JP
On 5/13/06, Kevin McAleavey <kevinmca () nsclean com> wrote:PROOF, please? That lengthy impeachment was supposed to be about all that ..._______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
_______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests Fergie (May 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests Young, Keith (May 12)
- Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests Brian Loe (May 13)
- Message not available
- Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests Kevin McAleavey (May 13)
- Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests Valdis . Kletnieks (May 14)
- Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests Kevin McAleavey (May 14)
- Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests Brian Loe (May 15)
- Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests Dude VanWinkle (May 15)
- Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests Brian Loe (May 13)