Re: U.S. Homeland Security Official Arrested in Online Sex Sting

["Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com>]

On 4/5/06, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah <rMslade () shaw ca> wrote:

> The exact wording of specific statutes can be important here.  However, there are
> other issues related to this concept.  In one of my recent classes I had a couple of
> LEOs who had been forced to look into situations where "producers" and
> distributors of child porn had used some fairly sophisticated image manipulation to
> a) "enhance" "desireable" characteristics (which is, itself, fairly ick-making), b)
> destroy evidence that could be used to investigate the crime and track down
> victims, and c) cloud the legal issue for those caught in possession.
>
> (Sorry, I suppose this issue isn't much fun.)

Child pornography isn't the same as "online seduction" - whatever that
is supposed to mean in this context. Hey, I want to know, what DOES
"seduction" mean in this context? :)

The FEB knew it was a crime 'cause he got a hard-on - and was
therefore, clearly, seduced?

> > I'd
> > save us all a lot of money and simply spend 50 cents on a .45 and be
> > done with it.
>
> Are they really that cheap where you are?

Cheaper, actually.

How's that firearms registration thing going for you, btw?

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.