funsec mailing list archives
Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet"
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 22:10:45 -0400
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:11:17 MDT, Dude VanWinkle said:
Also, is the degradation of services happening on the Client side, the Provider side, or both?
What QoS *really* means: "If we underengineered our backbone and can't carry everybody's packet, we throw away packets from the people who paid us the least". Alternatively: "Preferential treatment can degrade service, but it cannot improve service." -- <Michael.Dillon () btradianz com>
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 14)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Sean Donelan (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" and why it costs Kevin McAleavey (Apr 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 16)
- RE: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" StyleWar (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 16)