funsec mailing list archives
"Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet"
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:11:17 -0600
I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around this one, If you buy a T1 from AT&T, arent they supposed to provide 1.5 mbps to you? If google buys an OC48 or a few thousand Dedicated Lambdas, arent they supposed to get the bandwidth as well? Wouldnt adding/removing QoS to the packets violate the ToS? Are they still getting the B/W they paid for? Also, is the degradation of services happening on the Client side, the Provider side, or both? Easily Confused, -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 14)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Sean Donelan (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" and why it costs Kevin McAleavey (Apr 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 16)
- RE: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" StyleWar (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 15)