funsec mailing list archives
Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet"
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:27:23 -0600
On 4/16/06, Fergie <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
One more thing: A good primer & prerequisite for understanding QoS in packet communications is reading Len Kleinrock's works on queuing. It's all about queuing. ;-)
I guess I get it, I just never realized that ISP's dont have a QoS guarantee of thier own to uphold :-( -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" and why it costs, (continued)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" and why it costs Kevin McAleavey (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 16)
- RE: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" StyleWar (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 15)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Fergie (Apr 16)
- Re: "Network Neutrality" or "Open Internet" Dude VanWinkle (Apr 16)