funsec mailing list archives
Re: VoIP mangling
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:38:18 -0400
On 8/1/06, Larry Seltzer <Larry () larryseltzer com> wrote:
>>Does this fit in with network neutrality? Yes, this is what net neutrality is all about. Such telco discrimination, using QoS, is "not neutral".
How hard would it be to prove that an ISP had rate limited your business into extinction? I am assuming that even if the bill doesnt pass, monopolistic practices would still be illegal, of course getting your hands on their logs/config files might be a bit hard. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- VoIP mangling Dude VanWinkle (Aug 01)
- Message not available
- Re: VoIP mangling Kevin McAleavey (Aug 01)
- Message not available
- Re: VoIP mangling Dude VanWinkle (Aug 01)
- RE: VoIP mangling Larry Seltzer (Aug 01)
- Re: VoIP mangling Dude VanWinkle (Aug 01)
- RE: VoIP mangling Larry Seltzer (Aug 01)
- Re: VoIP mangling Dude VanWinkle (Aug 01)
- RE: VoIP mangling Larry Seltzer (Aug 01)
- Message not available
- Re: VoIP mangling Kevin McAleavey (Aug 01)
- Re: VoIP mangling vicky rode (Aug 01)
- Re: VoIP mangling Dude VanWinkle (Aug 01)
- Re: VoIP mangling Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 01)