Re: VoIP mangling

[vicky rode <vicky.rode () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

in-line:

Dude VanWinkle wrote:
> On 8/1/06, Larry Seltzer <Larry () larryseltzer com> wrote:
> > > > Does this fit in with network neutrality?
> >
> > Yes, this is what net neutrality is all about. Such telco
> > discrimination, using QoS, is "not neutral".
>
>
> How hard would it be to prove that an ISP had rate limited your
> business into extinction?
- ------------------------------------
I guess..

a. If voip vendor(s) consistently get performance related complains
(dropping priority on voip related packets) from certain ISP customers,
these events can be documented, not sure if it will prove anything.

b. whistle blower :-)


regards,
/virendra


> I am assuming that even if the bill doesnt pass, monopolistic
> practices would still be illegal, of course getting your hands on
> their logs/config files might be a bit hard.
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEz+XepbZvCIJx1bcRAqz3AJ9cuveGv89eUrdvJq2AFCgsRfCirwCgyYKZ
D7qZA2vtTSuRCp9WG1NpXPo=
=JPUJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.