funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention
From: "Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:42:17 -0500
On 6/27/07, Dave Dittrich <dittrich () u washington edu> wrote:
Brian Loe wrote:The practice is a violation of federal law (specifically the Presidential Records Act) anatord therefore well within the purview of their oversight.And oversight committees are nothing more than political attack dogs - used to chase red herrings and make headlines. They're always BS...Brian, you asked what authority Congress had to get into this, and its clear they have authority.
IF the e-mails contained information pertaining to White House work. That has not been proven.
You asked what's the big deal about White House or RNC email accounts, and its clear its a legal requirement for all executive branch communications to be handled in a legal manner.
The RNC is still under no obligation to save their e-mails, so far as I can tell, outside of this particular investigation. Neither is the Democratic party required to save their e-mails.
Now you attack all oversight committees.
I'm attacking a political entity and you take exception...okay, my bad. But can you name an oversight committee that ever accomplished anything? Most would mention, I suppose, Watergate...but that committee had their case handed to them by "deepthroat" and a couple of journalists.
Reminds me of a saying: "If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law AND the facts are against you, attack your opponent."
I don't agree with that reasoning in the least - though I've heard it hundreds of times.
Do I see another round of ad-hominem attacks coming, or can this thread die now? :)
The thread can die whenever the participants wish it to. As for ad-hominem attacks, I suggest you look elsewhere for them, I'm only a recipient... _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Fergie (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention rms (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Brian Loe (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention rms (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Brian Loe (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Matthew Murphy (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Brian Loe (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Matthew Murphy (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Brian Loe (Jun 28)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Dave Dittrich (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Brian Loe (Jun 28)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention Brian Loe (Jun 27)
- Re: [privacy] Gonzales Pushes Again for Increased ISP Data Retention rms (Jun 27)