Re: there aren't that many serious spammers any more?

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:33:40 EDT, John LaCour said:
> Richard Clayton posts on the Univ of Cambridge Blog about his analysis
> of Demon Internet spam traffic vs. non-spam traffic and concludes that
> most spam comes from a few gangs.
>
> Interesting article here:
> http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/04/03/there-arent-that-many-serious-spammers-any-more/

Spamhaus maintained a list of top spammers, and I don't think their list
ever got much bigger than "these 200 are responsible for 85% of the spam".
There of course are a lot of chickenboners out there, but they hardly matter
in the greater scheme of things.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.