funsec mailing list archives
Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:05:07 -0400
On Jul 13, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Nick FitzGerald <nick@virus- l.demon.co.uk> wrote:
John Payne to "Dude VanWinkle":Domain Keys sound like a bad/more complex implementation of the idea behind SPF IMO.. Am I totally off base on this one?YesNo, "Dude" is right that DK is basically a more complex version of the poor idea behind SPF.
I'm not sure how the ability to say "yes this really came from us" is a poor idea. SPF is fundamentally broken if for no other reason than it breaks forwarding.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam, (continued)
- RE: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Larry Seltzer (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Nick FitzGerald (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Paul Vixie (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Nick FitzGerald (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam John Payne (Jul 15)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)